IndieGame/client/Packages/com.unity.inputsystem@1.7.0/Documentation~/Workflow-Direct.md
DOBEST\zhaoyingjie f242607587 初始化工程
2024-10-11 10:12:15 +08:00

57 lines
2.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
uid: input-system-workflow-direct
---
# Workflow Overview - Directly Reading Device States
![image alt text](./Images/Workflow-Direct.svg)
This is the simplest and most direct workflow, but the least flexible. Its useful if you want a quick implementation with one type of device. It might not be the best choice if you want to provide your users with multiple types of input or if you want to target multiple platforms.
You can directly read the values from connected devices by referring to the devices [controls](Controls.html) and reading the values they are currently generating, using code like this:
```
using UnityEngine;
using UnityEngine.InputSystem;
public class MyPlayerScript : MonoBehaviour
{
void Update()
{
var gamepad = Gamepad.current;
if (gamepad == null)
{
return; // No gamepad connected.
}
if (gamepad.rightTrigger.wasPressedThisFrame)
{
// 'Use' code here
}
Vector2 move = gamepad.leftStick.ReadValue();
{
// 'Move' code here
}
}
}
```
The example above reads values directly from the right trigger, and the left stick, of the currently connected [gamepad](Gamepad.html). It does not use the input systems "Action" class, and instead the conceptual actions in your game or app, such as "move" and "use", are implicitly defined by what your code does in response to the input. You can use the same approach for other Device types such as the [keyboard](../api/UnityEngine.InputSystem.Keyboard.html) or [mouse](../api/UnityEngine.InputSystem.Mouse.html).
This is often the fastest way to set up some code which responds to input, but it is the least flexible because there is no abstraction between your code and the values generated by a specific device.
If you choose to use this technique:
* You wont benefit from Unitys management of [actions](Actions.html) and [interactions](Interactions.html).
* It is harder to make your game or app work with multiple types of [input device](Devices.html).
* Your input bindings are hard-coded in your script, so any changes to bindings require changes to the code.
* It is harder to allow the user to [remap their own controls to different actions at run time](ActionBindings.html#interactive-rebinding).
You can find an example of this workflow in the sample projects included with the input system package. To find it, in the Project window, look in **Assets > Samples > SimpleDemo** and open the scene: **SimpleDemo_UsingState**.
See [Supported Devices](SupportedDevices.html) for more information about devices supported by the input system, and the API to read their states.
For more a more flexible workflow, you should use [embedded actions](Workflow-Embedded.html) or [define your actions in an action asset](Workflow-ActionsAsset.html), explained in the following pages.